Northern River Otter - Lontra canadensis
( Schreber, 1777 )

 

 

No Map Available

Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$Photo1 in /var/www/vhosts/virtualzoo/classifications/display.php on line 584
No Photo Available No Map Available

Subspecies: Unknown
Est. World Population:

CITES Status: NOT LISTED
IUCN Status: Least Concern
U.S. ESA Status: NOT LISTED

Body Length:
Tail Length:
Shoulder Height:
Weight:

Top Speed:
Jumping Ability: (Horizontal)

Life Span: in the Wild
Life Span: in Captivity

Sexual Maturity: (Females)
Sexual Maturity: (Males)
Litter Size:
Gestation Period:

Habitat:

Adult North American river otters weigh from about 5 to 15 kg (Melquist et al. 2003). Size varies among geographic areas, with males typically larger than females. River otters display delayed implantation, resulting in a period of almost one year from time of breeding until giving birth. Young generally are born in February and March, and breeding occurs shortly thereafter, well before the young are independent (Liers 1951, Hamilton and Eadie 1964). Males and females are sexually mature at two years of age, but variation in the reproductive age has been reported (Hamilton and Eadie 1964, Docktor et al. 1987). Litters typically are comprised of 1 to 3 young (Hamilton and Eadie 1964, Tabor and Wight 1977, Docktor et al. 1987). Maximum life expectancy is typically about 10 years of age in the wild and up to 20 years of age in captivity (Stephenson 1977, Melquist et al. 2003).

The North American river otter is an aquatic-habitat generalist, capable of exploiting virtually all freshwater systems, estuaries, and some coastal and marine areas depending on the availability of adequate prey and riparian cover (Melquist et al. 2003). The diet of the river otter is comprised mostly of fish, but amphibians (mostly frogs), crustaceans (mainly crayfish), and birds may also be eaten depending on the region and season (Sheldon and Toll 1964, Knudsen and Hale 1968, Stenson et al. 1984, Serfass et al. 1990, Reid et al. 1994, Stearns et al. 2011). Typically, the slowest moving and most abundant fish (e.g., members of the sucker and minnow families) species are preyed upon most (Serfass et al. 1990, Stearns et al. 2011). Depending on availability, crayfish in some areas exceed the importance of fish in the river otter diet (Serfass et al. 1990). River otters prefer undisturbed riparian with adequate cover to serve as denning and resting sites (Swimley et al. 1998, Stevens et al. 2011). Both diet and riparian habitat use vary based on regional differences in aquatic systems and associated conditions.

Ultimately, river otter populations are limited by the distribution of suitable aquatic and riparian habitats. Consequently, any factors that reduce the quantity or degrade the quality of aquatic environments will adversely affect populations. River otters are often associated with aquatic habitats modified by the construction of dams and lodges by the American beaver (Castor canadensis) (Reid et al. 1994; Swimley et al. 1998, 1999). River otters are otherwise most active during nocturnal and crepuscular periods (Melquist and Hornocker 1983, Stevens and Serfass 2008). The extent of travel is influenced by sex, age class, region, season, and habitat conditions (Spinola et al. 2008). Males occupy larger home ranges than females (Melquist and Hornocker 1983, Reid et al. 1994, Melquist et al. 2003, Spinola et al.2008). Home ranges for river otters occupying riverine habitats in Idaho ranged from 8 to 78 km2 (Melquist and Hornocker 1983). River otters generally maintain low population densities (e.g., about 1 otter per 3.58 km of riparian habitat in Idaho; Melquist and Hornocker 1983), apparently without the need for overt (aggressive) displays of territoriality. Although considered to be territorial, home ranges of adjacent individuals may overlap to varying degrees based on gender and season (Melquist and Hornocker 1983, Spinola et al. 2008). River otters likely avoid aggressive interactions by practicing mutual avoidance through olfactory communication facilitated by scent marking at latrines. Predation on river otters has been reported, but is generally considered rare. River otters are presumably most vulnerable to being attacked and killed by larger predators when travelling overland or visiting latrine sites (e.g., gray wolves [Canis lupus], bobcats [Lynx rufus], coyotes [Canis latrans], domestic dogs [Canis familiaris] (Gable et al. (2017), and mountain lions [Puma concolor]; see Melquist et al. [2003] for a review of these and other reported examples of predation). However, there are isolated reports of river otters being preyed on in water (e.g., by the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis); (Crocodylus acutus) (see Lariviere and Walton 1998). Trapping river otters for fur is an important human-induced mortality factor in many conservation jurisdictions in the USA and Canada (Bricker et al. 2016).


Range:
At the time of the America’s first European colonization, the North American river otter was one of the most widely distributed mammalian species in North America, occurring in an area roughly bounded within 25° 08’–68° 20’ N latitude and 55° 30’–162° 49’ W longitude (Anderson 1977, Melquist et al. 2003). The species’ historic range included a variety of coastal and inland aquatic habitats throughout much of the North American continent, from arctic Alaska and northern Canada to the southern USA (Hall 1981, Melquist et al. 2003). By the mid-1950s the North American river otter had undergone severe population declines including local and regional extirpations throughout extensive portions of its historic range, especially in many non-coastal areas of the USA and southern Canada. However, river otters have recovered in many areas and now occupy aquatic habitats in at least portions of its historic range in each USA state (except Hawaii, where the species never occurred), Canadian province or territory, (except Canada’s Prince Edward Island where the populations are extirpated, although there is some evidence of individuals recolonizing the province). Recently, there is evidence of a population of North American river otters occupying an area of northern Mexico (Gallo-Reynoso 2019).

Conservation:
The North American river otter is included in CITES Appendix II. This listing is in place to assure that the ongoing legal trade does not contribute to illegal trade of similar species of otters with a higher level of conservation concern (i.e., what is referred to as “look-alike” species, which could be illegally integrated with the legal trade of species with a similar appearance. See USFWS, 2014). Although trapped for fur, the overall trade in the fur of North American river otter generally should be regarded as sustainable. Considering that the river otters had experienced substantial declines caused by unregulated fur harvest in the 1800s and degradation of aquatic habitats through the mid-1900s, the current status of the species should be regarded as a substantial conservation success story. These declines were particularly severe in the USA, where, by 1980, populations were considered completely extirpated from 11 states and endangered in 9 others (Bricker et al. 2016). However, populations have since expanded to occupy at least portions of the river otter’s historic range in all USA states and Canadian Provinces, except Prince Edwards Island (where there is recent evidence that some individuals may be pioneering the Province). The overall increase in the distribution and abundance of river otters was facilitated by a combination of reintroduction projects implemented in 22 states, improvements in aquatic habitat quality, and the natural expansion of native populations range (Bricker et al. 2016). The conservation status of river otter populations in North America has improved considerably through progressive conservation efforts, including implementation of clean water regulations (e.g., the federal Clean Water Act, EPA undated).

Camp (2017) provides a comprehensive literature review for the North American river otter, which will be extremely useful in developing conservation planning and developing conservatin0related research projects.


Questions? Comments? Suggestions? Additions?
Please contact The Virtual Zoo Staff


You are visitor count here since 21 May 2013

page design & content copyright © 2025 Andrew S. Harris

return to virtualzoo.org home

This page reprinted from http://www.virtualzoo.org. Copyright © 2025 Andrew S. Harris.

The Virtual Zoo, San Jose, CA 95125, USA