|
|---|
Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$Photo1 in /var/www/vhosts/virtualzoo/classifications/display.php on line 584
| Subspecies: | Unknown |
|---|---|
| Est. World Population: | |
| CITES Status: | NOT LISTED |
| IUCN Status: | Vulnerable |
| U.S. ESA Status: | NOT LISTED |
| Body Length: | |
| Tail Length: | |
| Shoulder Height: | |
| Weight: | |
| Top Speed: | |
| Jumping Ability: | (Horizontal) |
| Life Span: | in the Wild |
| Life Span: | in Captivity |
| Sexual Maturity: | (Females) |
| Sexual Maturity: | (Males) |
| Litter Size: | |
| Gestation Period: | |
This species inhabits coastal evergreen, lowland moist, montane and swamp forests. It is typically found high in the canopy of dense, primary rainforest, and is now only present in protected or undisturbed inaccessible areas. It appears unable to survive in secondary forest, and is rare or absent in forests where logging has reduced canopy height.
Colobus satanas is a highly arboreal, diurnal species. Like other colobines, they eat seeds and leaves (seeds being around 50-60% of the diet: Fleury and Brugière 2013). This species lives in groups averaging 13 individuals (range 5–30) and has an annual home range of between 70–570 ha (Fleury and Brugière 2013). They are often found in polyspecific troops with guenons and mangabeys.
This species is listed on Appendix II of CITES.
Colobus satanas occurs in many of the protected areas in its range, including one World Heritage Site: Lopé (Gabon). The stronghold of this species is now the protected areas of Gabon where it is still found in reasonably good shape, but it is becoming less and less abundant in the unprotected forests outside these protected areas. It is probably almost entirely absent across much of its former range south of the Sanaga in Cameroon apart from in some protected areas.
On Bioko, almost all remaining individuals of the subspecies C. s. satanas are in protected areas and have been hunted out elsewhere. Equatorial Guinea banned the hunting, sale and consumption of primates in 2007, but application of and compliance with this law is very weak (Cronin et al. 2016, Ruffler et al. 2012). The species is named on the completely protected list in Congo, but is not mentioned in the laws of the other three range states, which needs to be rectified.




